The economic recovery has been uneven, with wage gains for many workers offset by the highest inflation rate in four decades and the labor market roiled by the Great Resignation. The staggering death toll of the virus continues to rise, with nearly as many Americans lost in the pandemic’s second year as in the first, despite the widespread availability of vaccines. Mr Flaherty, in his email, called for a “good-faith dialogue” between Google and the White House which would include meetings every two weeks.The landscape in other ways remains unsettled. He said concern about it was “shared at the highest levels of the ”. In it, Mr Flaherty wrote that “YouTube is ‘funneling’ people into hesitance” about vaccines. The evidence presented in the case includes an email sent in April 2021 by Rob Flaherty, the White House’s director of digital strategy, to Google officials. In July 2021, Mr Biden claimed Facebook was “killing people” by spreading misinformation about coronavirus vaccines. Social media and other technology companies have in the past communicated regularly with the government, including during elections and the pandemic. There could still be communication if the government needed to issue warnings about a national security or criminal threat, he ruled.
CLIMATE LOCKDOWN 2021 BIDEN FREE
Judge Doughty’s injunction bans government departments from contacting social media companies for “the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech”. Injunction bans certain communications with social media firms Republicans have frequently accused the Biden administration of “strongarming” technology companies to “shut down debate” during the pandemic. In his ruling, Judge Doughty said that the attorneys general from Louisiana and Missouri had “produced evidence of a massive effort by defendants, from the White House to federal agencies, to suppress speech based on its content”. Thousands of communications between government officials and technology companies during the pandemic have been collected and presented in the court case, which is known as Missouri v. They claimed that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment by trying to block social media users exercising their right to free speech. Prosecutors in the Republican states of Louisiana and Missouri brought the case and accused the federal government of being involved in a “ censorship enterprise”. Fedeal government involved in ‘censorship enterprise’ The UK Government used an artificial intelligence firm to monitor social media sites and flag opposition to vaccine passports.
The ruling came after it was revealed last month that UK ministers set up a counter-disinformation unit which was used to target lockdown critics and those questioning the mass vaccination of children. The measure can be appealed by the Biden administration at the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, US news outlet Politico reported. There was no immediate comment on the injunction from the White House, Google or Facebook. “During the Covid-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterised by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth’,” the judge, an appointee of former president Donald Trump, wrote in his 155-page opinion. He also issued a temporary ban on federal officials and agencies from meeting with social media company executives for the purpose of removing First Amendment-protected speech. In a ruling issued on Tuesday, Terry Doughty, a Louisiana District Court Judge, backed claims that the US president’s administration had engaged in a “massive” attempt to stop Americans questioning the efficacy of vaccines online. Joe Biden launched an “ Orwellian Ministry of Truth” to shut down Covid dissent during the pandemic, a US judge has said.
0 kommentar(er)
